Pollution Worse in Portables
From: Robina Suwol
Date: 26 Jun 2003
Time: 06:39:09
Remote Name: 65.66.172.139
Comments
Pollution worse in portables
By Kerry Cavanaugh
Staff Writer
Tuesday, June 24, 2003 -
Portable classrooms have significantly higher levels of toxic chemicals than
permanent classrooms, according to a
new state study that confirms what environmentalists and teachers have long
suspected.
While both traditional and portable classrooms have problems with indoor air
pollution and poor ventilation,
portables generated more complaints from teachers and were 10 times more
likely to exceed health guidelines on
exposure to formaldehyde -- a suspected cancer-causing chemical used
frequently in prefabricated bungalows, the
study found.
"The lesson is, believe the students and believe the teachers when they say
they are getting sick from these
classrooms," Bill Walker, vice president of the Environmental Working Group,
said Tuesday.
The high formaldehyde levels found in classrooms can contribute to cancer and
pose a risk of eye, nose and respiratory irritation in children and teachers
with asthma and allergies.
Some pollution could be cut by improving air ventilation, fixing water leaks
and thoroughly vacuuming, according to
the report released Monday by the California Department of Health Services and
Air Resources Board, which sampled
1,000 classrooms.
But in the future, schools should retire old portable classrooms and redesign
bungalows.
State officials admit the report's findings -- part of a two-year study on
health and safety conditions in portable
classrooms -- were no surprise.
"It's been an assumption for quite some time," said Gennet Paauwe, an air
board spokeswoman.
Since the mid-1990s, state agencies have sent schools information on proper
ventilation of portables, which now
number about 80,000 -- roughly one-third of the state's classrooms -- but have
received little feedback.
The problem hit home in 1999, when six Saugus children were diagnosed with
high levels of arsenic and cancer-causing
benzene in their blood -- a result, their physicians believed, of toxin-laden
building materials in a poorly
ventilated portable classroom.
While Saugus Union School District officials said at the time there was no
conclusive link between the illnesses and
the portable classrooms, the district did adopt a program to survey teachers
and check environmental conditions in
classrooms.
Likewise the Los Angeles Unified School District, which has about 8,800
portable classrooms, has adopted a broad
health and safety inspection program to investigate environmental complaints
in classrooms.
While the study found that half the state's portable classrooms exceeded
health guidelines for eight-hour indoor
exposure to formaldehyde, and one-hour exposure levels were 10 times as likely
to exceed health guidelines as were
permanent classrooms, some health officials downplayed the potential danger.
"Even though these levels may be higher than a conventional classroom, they
probably won't pose a major health
risk," said Dr. Cyrus Rangan, director of toxics epidemiology for Los Angeles
County Health Services.
"The more practical approach in this case is to have better ventilation," he
said.
Last changed: March 14, 2006